I really enjoyed reading through each of these articles. I felt challenged by some but recognized my own bias while reading others. I plan to use the information from Evaluating Children’s Books for Bias within my own classroom. This will be especially helpful as I go forward with my research project as it is based upon using “culturally specific” literature. This guide can help me pick the best books for my students.
It was really interesting to read about the racism found with some multicultural books. Too often we never stop to think about the books we read. I know that the examples provided were just one of many and as educators we have to be careful not to further spread bias, no matter how culturally authentic they may be.
I appreciated the list from Examples of Good Multicultural and Anti-Bias Literature. I only have one of these titles in my collection but am always looking for more good books to add. I know how important it is to challenge my students think about topics and to help them evaluate their own identity, especially at a young age.
I can honestly say that some of my own bias began to show as I read Beyond Pink and Blue. I actually did a presentation about diversity for my school last year and part of this was based upon the diversity of the sexes. I recognize we can promote sexism with the school with something as simple as saying “Good Morning Boys and Girls”. Why do we make that distinction and why do we always put “boys” first? In thinking about my class I can already see the “girly girly” in so many of my students. They love pink and anything that sparkles. I had to stop and think where did this come from? Were they thought the sterotypes about what a girl should like? The same is for my boys, most of them love sports (espeically football) and I even had one child ask me just this week if “girls can play football?” Personally, growing up blue was always my favorite color, and I remember not understanding why on television the girls never had the color blue. As I continued to read however I realized that some of the titles mentioned are things I have no intentions of ever reading to my students. I know that I hold biases regarding sexuality and have no plans to read books like King and King or Heather Has Two Mommies to my students. I’m familiar with both these text but would never share them with my class. I’m just not comfortable. I have had students who had “two mommies” but rather than talking about it, I just left it alone. I can’t in good conscience tell my students its okay to be gay when that’s not what I believe. I’m in no what saying homosexuals/lesbians should be mistreated but I just do not agree with that lifestyle. I do not believe in spreading hatred toward someones choice to be homosexual, and if the topic ever comes up of course I will address it the best way possible. Now, I’m sure someone reading this will disagree with me and say that I’m wrong but this is just how I feel.
I was particularly disturbed by the misrepresentation of the Carlisle School discussed in the article Fiction Posing As Truth. In my own reading about the CarlisleSchool I know the harsh mistreatment faced by Native Americans and I am shocked an author would attempt to shine such a positive light on such an unfortunate time in American history. I’m further “outraged” that Scholastic would publish such a book. That’s why we as educators must carefully evaluate the literature we share with our students.
Lastly, in Down But Not Out I felt challenged to continue to step beyond the “frills” of multicultural/anti-racist education. I’m proud to say that at my school we are paying close attention to culture and each of us isstriving to be “Culturally Proficient” educators. Unfortunately, I won’t be there next year to be apart of the next steps toward change at Stonewall Tell, but hopefully I can help establish a tradition of multicultural education at the new school (pending that’s where I end up once the surplus is over).